How StaffSense works

From context to allocation, without the guesswork.

A connected workflow helps teams gather inputs, compare recommendations, exercise judgement and preserve a clear decision record.

01
Create the foundation

Set up the institution workspace

Account owners and administrators configure roles, subjects, classes, campuses and term structures around existing operations.

Tenant settingsRole accessSubject setupClass import
02
Gather staff context

Lecturers maintain their own inputs

Staff update their availability, preferred subjects, locations and delivery modes, reducing administrative chasing.

AvailabilityPreferencesConstraintsProfile data
03
Generate options

Rank potential matches transparently

The recommendation engine compares class needs with availability, preferences, workload and carefully interpreted historical signals.

Multi-factor scoreReason codesExclusionsWeights
04
Apply judgement

Review, approve or override

Administrators inspect ranked options, resolve conflicts and document the rationale where a different allocation is needed.

Human reviewConflict checksOverridesApproval
05
Close the loop

Publish, report and learn

Final schedules are published to lecturers while logs, reports and linked outcomes preserve institutional knowledge.

PublishReportsAudit logsHistory

Designed for oversight

The system recommends. Your team decides.

StaffSense is intentionally human-in-the-loop. Recommendations accelerate review without turning a complex academic decision into an automated verdict.

  • Compare ranked alternatives before approving.
  • See why a lecturer was included or excluded.
  • Record override reasons for governance.
  • Trace final allocations back to their inputs.
Decision review

Approve allocation

Ready
EKDr Elena KimRecommended · 4 supporting reasons94%
Review checklist
Scheduling conflictsNone foundPassed
Workload targetWithin rangePassed
Decision recordReady to saveReady

Bring structure to your next staffing cycle.