Security and governance
StaffSense is designed for sensitive institutional workflows, with clear access boundaries, traceable decisions and human oversight built into the operating model.
Core principles
The product connects recommendations to the people, inputs and decisions around them, so outcomes remain understandable and accountable.
Every tenant operates within its own institutional boundary. Role and tenant checks ensure users access only the data and workflows relevant to their organisation.
Account owners, administrators, auditors, lecturers and students each receive purpose-specific permissions and views.
Recommendation generation, approvals, overrides, imports and publication events are recorded for governance and review.
Score breakdowns and reason codes help authorised users understand, challenge and justify the options presented.
No recommendation becomes a final allocation without review. Administrators retain authority to approve, reject or override outcomes.
Responsible recommendations
Student survey results are handled carefully and used only as one contextual signal alongside availability, preferences, workload and institutional judgement.
Recommendations avoid relying on a single metric or narrow indicator.
Survey comments and aggregates are visible only to authorised roles.
Every final allocation remains subject to explicit human approval.
Common questions
No. StaffSense is designed around institution-aware records and tenant-scoped authorisation so data, recommendations, reports and logs remain isolated.
No. It provides ranked, explainable recommendations. An authorised administrator must review and approve or override the recommendation before publication.
Feedback is aggregated and treated as one contextual signal among several. It is not intended to operate as the sole basis for a recommendation.
Yes. Override status, reasons, approver details and related recommendation records are retained to support traceability and institutional review.